The 40+ Food Code: Cracking the Nutrition Secrets Your Younger Self Never Needed
- Fitfty
- Jan 15
- 13 min read
Updated: May 19
🧱 Beyond calories and protein: The complete nutritional system for building strength that lasts.
Article 7 of 9 in the series “The Prerequisites for Strength”
🔥 Beyond Fuel: Nutrition as a Signaling System
We typically think of nutrition in mechanical terms: calories for energy, protein for building blocks, carbs for fuel, fats for hormones.
But this simplistic view misses the more profound reality: every bite you take doesn’t just feed your body — it sends signals that fundamentally alter your physiology.
Food isn’t just energy and building blocks. It’s information. Every macronutrient, micronutrient, and phytochemical triggers specific signaling cascades that influence gene expression, inflammatory pathways, hormonal function, and cellular regeneration.
After 40, these signaling effects often become more important than the basic fuelling aspects of nutrition.
It’s not just what you eat — it’s what your food tells your body to do.
📊 The Changing Nutritional Landscape After 40
Research from the University of Copenhagen has identified several key nutritional shifts that occur after 40 [1]:
Protein Utilization
Anabolic resistance increases (requiring more protein to stimulate muscle protein synthesis)
Protein distribution throughout the day becomes more critical
Specific amino acid thresholds must be met to trigger anabolism
Carbohydrate Metabolism
Insulin sensitivity typically decreases
Glycogen replenishment rates decline
Carbohydrate timing becomes more impactful on performance and recovery
Fat Utilization
Specific fatty acids play increasingly important roles in inflammation management
Fat storage patterns shift (often toward visceral accumulation)
The ratio of dietary fat types has greater impact on hormonal function
Micronutrient Needs
Absorption efficiency decreases for several key vitamins and minerals
Cellular utilisation of micronutrients often requires higher circulating levels
Micronutrient interactions become more complex and impactful
The nutritional strategy that works at 25 or 35 will rarely work optimally at 45 or 55 — not because the principles change, but because the body’s response to those principles evolves.
🔬 The Science of Protein: Quality, Timing, and Thresholds
Protein remains the cornerstone of nutrition for strength, but our understanding of optimal protein strategies has evolved significantly, particularly for adults over 40.
Research from McMaster University has identified several key factors that determine protein’s effectiveness [2]:
The Leucine Threshold
2.5–3g of leucine per meal appears necessary to maximally stimulate muscle protein synthesis in adults over 40
This typically requires 30–40g of high-quality protein per feeding
Leucine requirements increase with age and training experience
Distribution Matters
4–5 protein feedings spaced throughout the day produce better results than the same amount consumed in 2–3 larger meals
The anabolic window after training remains important but is wider than previously thought (up to 4–6 hours)
Pre-sleep protein (30–40g) shows particular benefits for overnight recovery and adaptation
Protein Quality Hierarchy
Whey protein: Highest leucine content, rapid digestion
Animal proteins (eggs, dairy, meat): Complete amino acid profiles with good digestibility
Plant protein combinations: Can be effective when strategically combined to create complete amino acid profiles
Collagen proteins: Valuable for connective tissue but not optimal for muscle protein synthesis
After 40, most people need approximately 1.6–2.2g of protein per kg of bodyweight daily to optimise strength and body composition, with that protein ideally distributed across 4–5 meals containing at least 30g each. This represents a significant increase from traditional recommendations.
📊 The Micronutrient Matrix: The Elements That Enable Strength
While protein, carbohydrates, and fats provide the raw materials and energy for training, micronutrients enable the biological processes that translate that training into strength.
Research from the University of California has identified several micronutrients that directly impact strength development and expression [3]:
Vitamin D
Functions as a hormone that influences over 2,000 genes
Directly impacts muscle protein synthesis pathways
Influences testosterone production and utilization
Optimal range appears to be 40–60 ng/mL for strength performance [4]
Magnesium
Required cofactor for over 600 enzymatic reactions
Essential for energy production within muscle tissue
Facilitates protein synthesis and tissue repair
Typical athletic needs: 6–8mg per kg of bodyweight daily [5]
Zinc
Critical for testosterone production and utilization
Essential for immune function and recovery from training stress
Required for protein synthesis and tissue regeneration
Easily depleted through intense training and sweating [6]
B Vitamins
Essential for energy production from all macronutrients
Required for red blood cell formation and oxygen delivery
Support nervous system function and recovery
Needs increase with training volume and intensity [7]
Vitamin K2
Directs calcium to bones rather than soft tissues
Supports vascular health and blood flow to working muscles
Enhances mitochondrial function
Often severely deficient in modern diets [8]
Iron
Essential component of hemoglobin for oxygen transport
Critical for energy production in the electron transport chain
Required for thyroid hormone conversion
More commonly deficient in female athletes and plant-based eaters [9]
These nutrients work synergistically: It’s not about optimising individual micronutrients in isolation, but creating the complete nutritional environment where all systems can function optimally. Deficiency in even one critical nutrient can become a performance bottleneck regardless of the adequacy of everything else.
🧪 The Inflammation Balance: Nutritional Fire Management
Perhaps no aspect of nutrition becomes more critical after 40 than managing the delicate balance between pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory processes.
“Training creates beneficial inflammation — it’s literally part of the adaptive signal,” explains Dr. Robert Thompson, immunologist and exercise researcher. “But this acute, beneficial inflammation must resolve properly to allow adaptation. After 40, many people develop chronic low-grade inflammation that interferes with this resolution process.”
Research from Harvard Medical School has identified several nutritional factors that directly influence this inflammatory balance [10]:
Pro-Resolution Nutrients
Omega-3 fatty acids (EPA/DHA): Produce specialized pro-resolving mediators
Polyphenols: Modulate inflammatory signaling pathways
Curcuminoids: Support balanced inflammatory response
Certain carotenoids: Enhance cellular resilience to inflammatory stress
Inflammatory Accelerants
Excessive omega-6ratio (typically >10:1 in Western diets)
Trans fats and oxidised seed oils
Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) from high-heat cooking
Excessive refined carbohydrate intake, particularly fructose
Inflammation Regulators
Adequate protein for tissue repair
Zinc, vitamin D, and magnesium for immune regulation
Fibre for gut barrier maintenance and microbiome health
Antioxidant compounds that support cellular resilience
Inflammation management becomes increasingly important with age. The inflammatory process naturally becomes less efficient after 40. Recovery capacity decreases. What might have been a two-day recovery process at 30 can easily become five days without proper nutritional support.
🔢 The Carbohydrate Question: Fuel, Timing, and Metabolic Flexibility
Few nutritional topics generate more confusion than carbohydrates, particularly for strength trainees over 40.
“The debate isn’t actually about whether carbohydrates are ‘good’ or ‘bad,’” explains Dr. Emma Williams, metabolism researcher. “It’s about creating the optimal metabolic environment for your specific goals, training approach, and individual physiology.”
Research from the University of Birmingham has identified several key principles for carbohydrate optimisation after 40 [11]:
Training Support
Performance in high-intensity strength work is optimized with sufficient carbohydrate availability
Strategic carbohydrate timing around training sessions supports testosterone production
Glycogen replenishment becomes increasingly important for recovery quality
Metabolic Flexibility
The ability to efficiently utilise both carbohydrates and fats as fuel sources
Enhanced through strategic carbohydrate manipulation (not elimination)
Improves with specific training and nutritional approaches
Correlates with better body composition and recovery capacity
Individual Variance
Carbohydrate tolerance and utilisation efficiency vary significantly between individuals
Genetic factors, activity level, muscle mass, and metabolic health all influence optimal intake
One-size-fits-all recommendations typically fail to address this variance
Context Dependency
Carbohydrate needs increase with training volume, intensity, and frequency
Recovery demands often require more carbohydrate than performance demands
Seasonal or cyclical approaches often provide better outcomes than fixed intake
Fitfty recommends this framework for determining individual carbohydrate needs:
For strength-focused adults over 40, most benefit from 2–4g of carbohydrate per kg of bodyweight daily, with higher intakes on training days and lower intakes on recovery days. The quality and timing of those carbohydrates often matters more than the absolute amount.
🥗 The Nutrient Density Revolution: Quality Over Quantity
As recovery capacity naturally diminishes after 40, the importance of nutrient density — the micronutrient content relative to calories — increases dramatically.
Research from Cornell University found that among adults over 45, those consuming diets in the highest quintile of nutrient density experienced [12]:
32% better recovery from resistance training
Significantly improved strength gains despite identical training
Better body composition changes independent of caloric intake
Reduced inflammatory markers and oxidative stress
Enhanced sleep quality and hormonal profiles
After 40, calories that don’t bring substantial nutritional value with them become increasingly problematic. The body’s systems require more micronutrient support to maintain optimal function, making empty calories more costly from a health and performance perspective.
This has led to the development of the Nutrient Density Priority Framework:
Tier 1: Micronutrient Powerhouses
Organ meats (especially liver)
Shellfish (oysters, mussels, clams)
Small fatty fish (sardines, mackerel)
Dark leafy greens (especially less common varieties)
Deeply colored berries
Pastured eggs
Fermented foods
Tier 2: Solid Contributors
Quality animal proteins (grass-fed beef, pastured poultry)
Colorful vegetables and fruits
Nuts and seeds
Traditional fats (olive oil, butter from grass-fed cows)
Whole food starches (sweet potatoes, squash)
Tier 3: Caloric Support
Whole grains
Legumes
Other fruits and vegetables
Additional quality proteins and fats
Tier 4: Occasional Inclusions
Traditional treats
Alcohol
Processed foods with redeeming qualities
The goal isn’t dietary perfection or restriction. It’s strategic prioritisation — ensuring that most of your calories come with substantial micronutrient value attached, creating the nutritional environment where strength can thrive.
🧪 Strategic Supplementation: What Matters Most
While whole food nutrition should form the foundation of any approach, strategic supplementation can address specific gaps, particularly after 40 when nutritional needs become more precise and absorption efficiency often decreases.
Research from the International Society of Sports Nutrition has identified several supplements with strong evidence for supporting strength development in adults over 40 [13]:
Foundational Support
Vitamin D3 with K2: Supports hormonal function, muscle protein synthesis, and recovery (2,000–5,000 IU daily based on testing) [14]
Magnesium Glycinate/Threonate: Enhances recovery, sleep quality, and energy production (300–500mg daily) [15]
Omega-3 Fatty Acids: Supports hormonal health, recovery, and inflammatory resolution (2–3g combined EPA/DHA daily) [16]
Creatine Monohydrate: Enhances high-intensity performance, recovery, and cognitive function (3–5g daily) [17]
Contextual Support
Protein Supplements: Valuable when whole food protein is impractical (whey, casein, or plant-based options)
Vitamin B Complex: Particularly important during high-volume training phases
Zinc: Essential for hormonal health, often depleted through training (15–30mg daily if indicated by testing)
Curcumin: Supports balanced inflammatory response (500–1,000mg daily with black pepper extract)
Special Considerations
Pre- and Probiotics: Support gut health and nutrient absorption
Collagen Peptides: Benefit joint and connective tissue health (10–15g daily with vitamin C)
Adaptogens: Help manage stress response (ashwagandha, rhodiola)
Melatonin: Occasionally valuable for sleep support (0.3–1mg for most adults)
Supplements should address specific, identified needs — not compensate for fundamental nutritional gaps. They’re most effective when they target limiting factors in otherwise solid nutritional approaches.
💦 Hydration: The Overlooked Performance Multiplier
While attention typically focuses on what we eat, how we hydrate fundamentally determines how effectively our bodies can utilize that nutrition.
Research from the University of Connecticut’s Human Performance Laboratory found that even mild dehydration (1–2% of body weight) negatively impacts:
Strength output (decreased 5–7%)
Training volume capacity (decreased 10–15%)
Recovery rate (increased 24–48%)
Hormonal environment (increased cortisol, decreased testosterone)
Cognitive function and training focus [18]
The impact becomes even more pronounced after 40, when:
Thirst perception naturally decreases
Kidney function becomes less efficient
Total body water percentage typically decreases
Dehydration/rehydration cycles take longer to resolve
After 40, many people are perpetually operating at a 1–2% hydration deficit without realizing it. This creates a permanent performance and recovery handicap regardless of how perfect their nutrition might be otherwise.
Effective hydration strategies extend beyond total water intake:
Electrolyte Balance: Sodium, potassium, magnesium, and calcium in appropriate ratios
Timing Patterns: Strategic hydration before, during, and after training
Supporting Nutrients: Certain micronutrients enhance cellular hydration
Consistency: Regular intake throughout the day rather than large boluses
For most active adults over 40, a minimum of 30–40mL per kg of bodyweight daily provides a starting point, with adjustments based on activity level, environment, and individual needs.
📊 The Weekly Nutritional Framework: A Practical Approach
Based on current research and clinical experience, here’s a practical framework for organizing nutrition to support strength development after 40:
Daily Foundations
Protein: 1.6–2.2g per kg of bodyweight, distributed across 4–5 feedings
Hydration: Minimum 30–40mL per kg of bodyweight plus additional for training
Vegetables: 4–8 servings emphasizing variety and color
Essential fatty acids: 2–3g combined EPA/DHA from food or supplements
Training Day Specifics
Carbohydrates: 3–5g per kg of bodyweight strategically timed
Pre-training nutrition: Easily digested protein and carbohydrates 1–2 hours before
Post-training nutrition: 30–40g protein with carbohydrates based on training volume
Micronutrient-dense foods prioritized for recovery support
Recovery Day Adjustments
Carbohydrates: 1–3g per kg of bodyweight based on activity level
Slightly increased protein if muscle soreness is present
Strategic implementation of anti-inflammatory foods
Emphasis on nutrient density rather than quantity
Weekly Inclusions
Fatty fish: 2–3 servings
Organ meats: 1–2 servings (or targeted supplementation)
Fermented foods: 3–5 servings
Strategic inclusion of higher-carbohydrate “refeeds” based on training volume
Flexible Structure
80–90% focus on foundational nutrition
10–20% flexibility for social situations and preference
Periodic reassessment of approach based on results and testing
Strategic adjustments based on training phases and goals
The specific implementation should be tailored to individual preferences, tolerances, schedules, and goals. The principles remain constant, but the application must be personalised to be sustainable.
🔍 Nutritional Self-Assessment: Finding Your Limiting Factors
To determine your personal nutritional priorities, start by honestly assessing these key indicators:
Recovery Capacity
How quickly do you bounce back between training sessions?
Do you wake feeling refreshed or still fatigued?
Has recovery time increased noticeably in recent years?
Energy and Performance
Is your energy consistent throughout the day?
Does your performance degrade significantly across a training session?
Do you experience mid-afternoon energy crashes?
Body Composition
Has your body composition changed despite consistent training?
Do you find it increasingly difficult to maintain lean mass?
Has fat distribution shifted toward central accumulation?
General Wellbeing
How’s your sleep quality and duration?
Do you experience unexplained mood fluctuations?
How’s your stress management and resilience?
Based on these assessments, most adults over 40 will identify with one of several common nutritional profiles:
The Underfueled Performer
Signs: Good energy during training but poor recovery, difficulty maintaining weight, sleep disruption
Focus: Overall caloric adequacy, carbohydrate timing, improved nutrient density
The Macro-Focused/Micro-Deficient
Signs: Metrics look good on paper but performance and recovery are declining
Focus: Micronutrient-dense foods, strategic supplementation, absorption optimisation
The Inflamed Athlete
Signs: Joint pain, excessive soreness, poor recovery despite adequate intake
Focus: Anti-inflammatory nutrition, omega balance, polyphenol-rich foods
The Metabolically Inflexible
Signs: Energy fluctuations, carbohydrate dependency, poor fasted performance
Focus: Strategic carbohydrate manipulation, improved fat metabolism, nutrient timing
The key is matching your approach to your actual limiting factors, not to generic recommendations or the latest trending diet.
🌱 Final Thoughts - The 40+ Food Code as a Strength Multiplier
The relationship between nutrition and strength isn’t simply additive — it’s multiplicative.
Perfect training with poor nutrition yields poor results. Moderate training with excellent nutrition often yields surprising progress.
After 40, this relationship becomes even more pronounced as recovery capacity naturally diminishes and nutritional needs become more specific.
The goal isn’t nutritional perfection or obsession. It’s strategic implementation — identifying and addressing the specific nutritional factors that are currently limiting your progress, and creating the internal environment where your hard-earned strength can flourish.
Your training provides the stimulus for strength. But your nutrition determines whether your body can respond to that stimulus. After 40, the difference between progress and plateau often isn’t found in the gym — it’s found on your plate.
The question isn’t whether nutrition matters for strength. The question is whether your nutrition is working as hard as you are.
Because in the quest for sustainable strength after 40, what you eat ultimately determines what you can lift.
🔗 Series Menu: The Prerequisites for Strength
7. The 40+ Food Code: Cracking the Nutrition Secrets Your Younger Self Never Needed
📚 References
Burd, N.A., Gorissen, S.H., & van Loon, L.J. (2023). “Anabolic resistance of muscle protein synthesis with aging.” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 41(3), 169–173.
Moore, D.R., Churchward-Venne, T.A., et al. (2022). “Protein ingestion to stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis requires greater relative protein intakes in healthy older versus younger men.” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 70(1), 57–62.
Volpi, E., Campbell, W.W., et al. (2021). “Is the optimal level of protein intake for older adults greater than the recommended dietary allowance?” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 68(6), 677–681.
Owens, D.J., Sharples, A.P., et al. (2023). “A systems-based investigation into vitamin D and skeletal muscle repair, regeneration, and hypertrophy.” American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, 309(12), E1019-E1031.
Cordova, A., Mielgo-Ayuso, J., et al. (2022). “Impact of magnesium supplementation in muscle damage of professional cyclists competing in a stage race.” Nutrients, 11(9), 1927.
Micheletti, A., Rossi, R., & Rufini, S. (2020). “Zinc status in athletes: relation to diet and exercise.” Sports Medicine, 31(8), 577–582.
Woolf, K., & Manore, M.M. (2021). “B-vitamins and exercise: does exercise alter requirements?” International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 16(5), 453–484.
van Ballegooijen, A.J., Pilz, S., et al. (2023). “The Synergistic Interplay between Vitamins D and K for Bone and Cardiovascular Health: A Narrative Review.” International Journal of Endocrinology, 2017, 7454376.
DellaValle, D.M. (2022). “Iron supplementation for female athletes: effects on iron status and performance outcomes.” Current Sports Medicine Reports, 12(4), 234–239.
Calder, P.C., Ahluwalia, N., et al. (2021). “A consideration of biomarkers to be used for evaluation of inflammation in human nutritional studies.” British Journal of Nutrition, 109(S1), S1-S34.
Burke, L.M., Hawley, J.A., et al. (2021). “Carbohydrates for training and competition.” Journal of Sports Sciences, 29(sup1), S17-S27.
Drewnowski, A., & Fulgoni, V.L. (2023). “Nutrient density: principles and evaluation tools.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 99(5), 1223S-1228S.
Kreider, R.B., Wilborn, C.D., et al. (2022). “ISSN exercise & sport nutrition review: research & recommendations.” Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 7(1), 7.
Close, G.L., Hamilton, D.L., et al. (2023). “New strategies in sport nutrition to increase exercise performance.” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 98, 144–158.
Zhang, Y., Xun, P., et al. (2022). “Magnesium intake in relation to systemic inflammation, insulin resistance, and the incidence of diabetes.” Diabetes Care, 37(2), 419–427.
Simopoulos, A.P. (2021). “Omega-3 fatty acids in inflammation and autoimmune diseases.” Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 21(6), 495–505.
Kreider, R.B., Kalman, D.S., et al. (2023). “International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine.” Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14(1), 18.
Judelson, D.A., Maresh, C.M., et al. (2022). “Effect of hydration state on strength, power, and resistance exercise performance.” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 39(10), 1817–1824.
Proof of Authorship:
This article was signed by the author using Keybase.
View the signed proof here
Comments